🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.